Quiz 4: Logical Reasoning IQ Test: Deduce the Answer in 10 Questions
Read each scenario carefully and choose the most logically sound answer. Click Check My Logical IQ to see how sharp your reasoning skills really are!
Answers and Clarifications
Understand the logical reasoning behind each solution. Click on any question below to view its detailed explanation.
Question 1: Syllogistic Reasoning
Correct Answer: C) Some philosophers may be writers
This is a categorical syllogism:
- Premise 1: All philosophers are thinkers
- Premise 2: Some thinkers are writers
- Conclusion: Some philosophers may be writers
We cannot conclude "all philosophers are writers" because only some thinkers are writers. However, since all philosophers are thinkers, and some thinkers are writers, it's possible that some philosophers are among those thinkers who are writers.
Question 2: Conditional Logic
Correct Answer: B) We cannot determine what day it is
This tests understanding of conditional statements:
- The statement "If today is Thursday, then the day after tomorrow is Saturday" is true
- But we're told "Today is not Thursday"
- When the condition (today is Thursday) is false, we cannot determine the truth of the consequence
If today were Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday, Saturday, or Sunday, the day after tomorrow would not be Saturday. We simply don't have enough information.
Question 3: Transitive Reasoning
Correct Answer: D) John is taller than Sarah
This uses transitive reasoning:
- John > Mike (John is taller than Mike)
- Mike > Sarah (Mike is taller than Sarah, since Sarah is shorter than Mike)
- Therefore: John > Mike > Sarah, so John > Sarah
We cannot determine if Mike is tallest (there could be someone taller than John) or if John is shortest (there could be someone shorter than Sarah). But the transitive relationship guarantees John is taller than Sarah.
Question 4: Categorical Logic
Correct Answer: A) No snakes are warm-blooded
This uses categorical syllogism:
- Premise 1: No reptiles are warm-blooded
- Premise 2: All snakes are reptiles
- Conclusion: No snakes are warm-blooded
If all snakes belong to the category of reptiles, and no reptiles have the property of being warm-blooded, then no snakes can be warm-blooded.
Question 5: Denying the Consequent
Correct Answer: C) We cannot be sure if it rained
This tests understanding of conditional logic:
- Statement: If P (rains) then Q (game cancelled)
- We know: Not Q (game not cancelled)
- We cannot conclude: Not P (did not rain)
The game could have been cancelled for other reasons besides rain. Just because the game wasn't cancelled doesn't mean it didn't rain - maybe they played in the rain, or the game was indoors.
Question 6: Set Theory Logic
Correct Answer: B) Some mammals are not dogs
This uses set theory reasoning:
- Dogs ⊂ Mammals (all dogs are mammals)
- Cats ⊂ Mammals (some mammals are cats)
- Since cats exist as mammals, and dogs don't include all mammals, some mammals must not be dogs
We cannot conclude anything about the relationship between dogs and cats specifically, only that the mammal category contains more than just dogs.
Question 7: Correlation vs Causation
Correct Answer: D) John may have eaten peanuts
This tests understanding of logical necessity:
- We know: Eating peanuts → Rash (whenever John eats peanuts, he gets a rash)
- We observe: Rash
- We cannot conclude: Ate peanuts (this would be affirming the consequent fallacy)
John could have gotten the rash from other causes (other foods, allergies, skin conditions). We can only say peanuts are one possible cause, not the certain cause.
Question 8: Logical Deduction
Correct Answer: A) All squares have four sides
This uses simple deductive reasoning:
- Premise 1: All squares are rectangles
- Premise 2: All rectangles have four sides
- Conclusion: All squares have four sides
If every square is a rectangle, and every rectangle has four sides, then every square must have four sides. This is a valid deductive argument.
Question 9: Modus Tollens
Correct Answer: C) The battery has charge
This uses the logical rule of Modus Tollens:
- If P (battery dead) then Q (car won't start)
- Not Q (car started)
- Therefore: Not P (battery not dead)
This is valid reasoning. If the battery were dead, the car wouldn't start. Since the car started, the battery cannot be dead, so it must have charge.
Question 10: Chain Reasoning
Correct Answer: B) Some doctors are scientists
This uses chain reasoning:
- Some doctors are researchers
- All researchers are scientists
- Therefore: The doctors who are researchers must also be scientists
- Thus: Some doctors are scientists
We cannot conclude "all doctors are scientists" because only some doctors are researchers. But those doctors who are researchers must be scientists since all researchers are scientists.
Select a Question to View Its Answer
Click on any of the question tabs above to see the detailed logical reasoning behind each solution.
Logical reasoning involves identifying valid arguments, avoiding fallacies, and drawing sound conclusions from given premises.
Comments
Post a Comment