IQ Test #19: Critical Analysis and Deductive Logic

Answers and Clarifications

Understand the logical reasoning behind each solution. Click on any question below to view its detailed explanation.

Question 1: Syllogistic Reasoning Analysis

Correct Answer: C) No, it commits the fallacy of the undistributed middle

This tests understanding of categorical syllogisms and logical fallacies:

Premise 1: All philosophers are thinkers (All P are T)
Premise 2: Some thinkers are writers (Some T are W)
Conclusion: Some writers are philosophers (Some W are P)

The fallacy occurs because:

The middle term "thinkers" is not distributed in either premise
We only know some thinkers are writers, not all thinkers
The writers who are thinkers might not be the same as the philosophers

This is a classic example of the fallacy of the undistributed middle, where the middle term doesn't connect the two categories in the necessary way for a valid conclusion.

Question 2: Logical Relationship Deduction

Correct Answer: B) Some musicians are not artists

This tests deductive reasoning with categorical statements:

Premise 1: No artists are accountants (All A are not C)
Premise 2: Some accountants are musicians (Some C are M)

Valid deduction:

From premise 2: Some musicians are accountants
From premise 1: All accountants are not artists
Therefore: Some musicians are not artists

This demonstrates the valid application of the categorical syllogism rules, specifically using the relationship between the three categories to draw a necessary conclusion.

Question 3: Fallacy Identification

Correct Answer: D) Hasty generalization

This tests recognition of common logical fallacies:

The argument: "This medicine must work because everyone I know who took it got better"

This commits hasty generalization because:

It draws a general conclusion from insufficient evidence
The sample size (people the speaker knows) is too small and likely biased
It doesn't account for other factors that could explain recovery
It assumes correlation implies causation without proper evidence

Hasty generalization occurs when someone makes a broad claim based on limited or unrepresentative evidence.

Question 4: Modus Tollens Recognition

Correct Answer: A) Not P

This tests understanding of basic deductive reasoning forms:

Premise 1: If P then Q (conditional statement)
Premise 2: Not Q (denial of the consequent)
Conclusion: Not P (denial of the antecedent)

This is the valid logical form called Modus Tollens (denying the consequent):

If P is true, then Q must be true. Since Q is false, P cannot be true.

This fundamental deductive pattern is essential for mathematical proofs, legal reasoning, and scientific hypothesis testing.

Question 5: False Dilemma Identification

Correct Answer: C) False dilemma

This tests recognition of the false dilemma fallacy:

The argument presents only two extreme options:

Option 1: Ban all cars
Option 2: City becomes uninhabitable

This is a false dilemma because:

It ignores middle ground possibilities
There could be other solutions (better public transport, electric cars, etc.)
It presents an artificially limited set of choices
The consequences are presented as inevitable when they're not

False dilemma fallacies often appear in political rhetoric and persuasive arguments where complex issues are oversimplified.

Question 6: Deductive vs Inductive Reasoning

Correct Answer: B) Deductively valid

This tests understanding of different reasoning types:

Premise 1: All mammals are warm-blooded
Premise 2: Whales are mammals
Conclusion: Whales are warm-blooded

This is deductively valid because:

If the premises are true, the conclusion must be true
It follows the logical form: All A are B, C is A, therefore C is B
The conclusion is necessarily contained within the premises

Deductive reasoning moves from general principles to specific conclusions, while inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to general conclusions.

Question 7: Genetic Fallacy Recognition

Correct Answer: D) Genetic fallacy

This tests identification of the genetic fallacy:

The argument: "You can't trust John's opinion on climate change because he's not a scientist"

This commits the genetic fallacy because:

It dismisses an argument based on its origin rather than its merits
It attacks the source rather than evaluating the evidence
Non-scientists can have valid opinions supported by evidence
The truth of climate change claims depends on evidence, not who makes them

The genetic fallacy occurs when someone judges an idea based on where it comes from rather than examining the idea itself.

Question 8: Practical Deductive Application

Correct Answer: A) The library is not open

This tests application of deductive reasoning to practical situations:

Conditional statement: If library is open, then Maria is there
Given: Maria is not there
Conclusion: Library is not open

This again uses Modus Tollens:

If P (library open) then Q (Maria there). Not Q (Maria not there), therefore not P (library not open).

This demonstrates how deductive logic applies to everyday reasoning and problem-solving situations.

Question 9: Appeal to Tradition Fallacy

Correct Answer: C) Appeal to tradition

This tests recognition of the appeal to tradition fallacy:

The argument: "This investment must be safe because it's been around for a long time"

This commits appeal to tradition because:

It assumes that longevity implies safety or quality
It appeals to tradition rather than examining actual evidence
Many unsafe things have existed for long periods
Investment safety depends on current factors, not just historical duration

Appeal to tradition fallacies are common in arguments where people resist change or innovation by appealing to "the way things have always been."

Question 10: Illicit Process Fallacy

Correct Answer: B) Invalid due to illicit process

This tests understanding of syllogistic rules and fallacies:

Premise 1: All politicians are public speakers
Premise 2: Some public speakers are lawyers
Conclusion: Some lawyers are politicians

This commits the fallacy of illicit process because:

The term "lawyers" is distributed in the conclusion but not in the premises
We only know some public speakers are lawyers, not all lawyers
The lawyers who are public speakers might not overlap with politicians
It violates the rule that any term distributed in the conclusion must be distributed in the premises

This demonstrates sophisticated understanding of categorical logic rules and fallacy detection.

Select a Question to View Its Answer

Click on any of the question tabs above to see the detailed logical reasoning behind each solution.

🔍

These critical analysis and deductive logic challenges test your ability to identify logical fallacies, evaluate argument validity, and apply systematic reasoning processes.

Why Master Critical Analysis and Deductive Logic?

Critical analysis and deductive logic are fundamental to rational thinking and effective decision-making. These skills enable you to:

Evaluate arguments and evidence systematically and objectively
Identify flawed reasoning and logical fallacies in discussions
Construct sound arguments and defend positions logically
Make better decisions by following valid reasoning processes
Excel in fields requiring precise logical analysis like law, science, and philosophy

These abilities are essential for anyone who needs to think clearly, reason effectively, and make well-supported judgments.

What This Test Measures

This Critical Analysis and Deductive Logic IQ Test evaluates several key analytical abilities:

Fallacy Detection: Identifying common errors in reasoning
Argument Evaluation: Assessing the validity and soundness of arguments
Deductive Reasoning: Applying logical rules to draw necessary conclusions
Categorical Logic: Understanding relationships between categories and classes
Logical Form Recognition: Identifying valid and invalid argument structures

These skills collectively represent your capacity for systematic, logical thinking and critical analysis.

IQ Test #19: Critical Analysis and Deductive Logic

🧠 Test Your Critical Analysis and Deductive Logic Skills!

Your Critical Analysis and Deductive Logic Results! 🌟